Giving a judge penis shaped candy isn’t grounds for dismissing a trial.

Giving a judge a penis-shaped chocolate may be “tasteless and inappropriate,” but it doesn’t make for an unfair trial, a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday.

Marcus Wellons, now 57, was convicted of the 1989 rape and strangling murder of 15-year-old India Roberts and sentenced to death in 1993.

In 2010, however, the Supreme Court ordered a review panel to take another look at the case after Wellon’s lawyer, Mary Elizabeth Wells, argued that her client could not have received a fair trial because the judge and bailiff received gifts of erotically shaped chocolate from jurors.

Superior Court Judge Mary Staley received a piece of white chocolate shaped like a penis from juror Mary Jo Hooper, while bailiff Loretta Perry was reportedly gifted a breast-shaped chocolate from a juror who has yet to come forward.

Wells maintained that the bawdy nature of the gifts indicated that the jury was not taking the murder trial seriously. [source-read the rest on Huff Po]

Just because the jury is sitting back eating chocolate dicks all the live long day, does not mean they aren’t taking the case seriously…..i suppose….i guess. I don’t know.

I know that if I was the judge and someone gave ME dick-shaped treats which i’m supposed to put in my mouth, i’m gonna take that as an insult to the fact that you are trying to tell me to eat a dick or something.  If not than maybe you are telling me to suck a dick? Get these nuts? Whatever you are trying to say, I think i would have more than enough cause to jump over that bench and bust you in your monkey-ass head with a gavel.

Keep your phallic-shaped candies to your damn self or be held in contempt of court.

Just saying.

SlausMalley McFluffy Obrien jackson.
When not responding to the dictate:" Will the Defendant Please Rise.." CEO and Creator of OHN;Slaus, is a comic illustrator and Social Media whore who spends his free time building legos, playing video games, drawing fantasy characters and being abused by his wife, two sons and cat.

Comments

comments

Comments

  1. Buttercreme Labeija says:

    Thank you Slaus,this just gave me my first giggle of the day<img src="http://i47.tinypic.com/2cz4uo5.gif&quot; border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic">

  2. MacDeezNuts says:

    Well, he tried…went from having hope to having it all taken away…bump that fool taking up space on death row
    <img src="http://i1148.photobucket.com/albums/o569/mac_willi/hugtodick.gif&quot; border="0" alt="Photobucket">

  3. Mynipzaintpank says:

    Where do yall get these gifs LMAO

  4. The Lurkasaurus Rex says:

    Getting dack-shaped candy from a juror? Nawl, son…that ain't got shyt to do with the evidence in ol Rapey-azz Rapist's trial. Candy ain't finna distract nobody.

    Jackin' ya junk with a paynus-pump during a trial?

    I guarantee you, there will be at least a few seconds of absolute distraction, and anybody sez otherwise just ain't doin' shyt right

  5. Unca_Ruckus says:

    At no time did the lawyer say, "My client didn't do it." I know someone that's getting a chocolate dack in his weekly mail.

  6. Leo_YardieChick says:

    I like how the lawyer feels that the fact that the judge got erotic candies from jurors means that her raping, murdering shyt-stain client shouldn't die.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE